Featured Links

Other Topics
Sponsored Links





Quote of the Day

"To sit in the shade on a fine day and look upon verdure is the most perfect refreshment."

Jane Austen








 




 
Featured Mutual Funds Articles

What Are Mutual Funds Loads?
Loads are the most talked about fees that mutual funds charge. A "load" on a mutual fund is just another way of saying that the fund charges a sales commission for purchase, sale, or both. There are funds that charge loads and there are funds that do not ...

Reasons to Fire Your Mutual Fund Company - Short Term Speculation
For most of the history of the Mutual Fund Industry average annual turnover hovered around 15 to 20 percent. This means that 15-20 percent of the funds portfolio changed each year. Put another way, the average holding period for a stock in a mutual fund ...

How to Evaluate Load vs. No Load Mutual Funds
If you have been dealing with mutual funds for any length of time, you undoubtedly have faced the question of which is better: Load Funds or No Load Funds. If you are new to investing, "load" simply refers to the commission paid to the broker selling the ...




Be Cautious When Studying Mutual Fund Ratings
 

Categories: Investing

Wherever you look, you will find various rating systems on mutual funds, each of which uses a different approach. All of them are designed to weed through the thousands of funds to get to the best ones. But is there really such a thing? Does a high rating really mean a fund will do better in the future? Many people seem to think so. A recent study showed that Morningstar, North America's most recognized rating system for funds, has a tremendous influence on fund sales. If Morningstar gives a five-star rating, those funds typically enjoy increased sales as a result.

While ranking providers are careful to warn investors that their ratings don't foretell the future, the star system is, unfortunately, used by some investors as if they were reading Consumer Reports to purchase a new drill. Supporters of the ranking approach argue that there's no subjective component to the star rating. It isn't determined by an analyst's review, and can't change simply because the service dislikes the fund's manager or its investment strategy. And that's good.

Performance will vary. Fund performance often falls off and risk levels rise during the subsequent three years after a fund is given an initial five-star Morningstar rating, suggests another recent study by Matthew Morey, a professor at Pace University. One reason for this is that after receiving a five-star rating the size of the fund grows dramatically, which then makes the fund unwieldy to manage, he suggests. Since Morey's study was completed, Morningstar also has changed the way it doles out top rankings to make them more precise. One of the biggest problems with all rating systems is that they are not necessarily predictive in nature. This means they're not really set up to tell you whether certain funds will necessarily do better in the future. For the most part, the ratings indicate how much you might have made and how much aggravation you faced in the process.

Combining risk and return. For example, one five-star fund might post moderate return scores, but incredibly low risk scores. Another five-star fund might have much higher-risk scores, but its return score could be strong enough to help it still rank in the top 10% of the pack.

In some cases, in fact, it's not even the same fund to begin with. Remember, after a management change, the rating stays with the fund, not the portfolio manager. Therefore, a fund's rating might be based almost entirely on the track record of a manager who is no longer with the fund.

Understand how the ratings were developed. Too many people put emphasis on the results without knowing how the results were achieved. If you are going to use ratings, take the time to understand how they were developed and what they really mean. It is not the destination but the journey that counts.

Past performance is no guarantee of the future. You have probably heard this disclaimer a thousand times before, but it is really important to understand. Most rating systems have little to no predictive element in them. It's natural to think that the best performer of the past will be the best performer in the future. Unfortunately, it's not that simple. Just think about it; if it were that easy, investors would just continue to buy last year's winners knowing that they will be this year's winners. And that seldom works.

Ratings are a very important element in trying to distinguish between good and bad funds. Good research, however, goes far beyond just looking for five stars or an A+. When evaluating funds, look at the quantitative, measurable characteristics of a fund: returns up against the benchmark, costs, risks, taxes and manager tenure. Use rating systems as part of your research, but remember: just because the analysts give them top marks, it does not mean they will be the best investment in the future, and doesn't it mean that they'll be the best investment for you in particular. Take the time to understand how the ratings were achieved. This will be the first step to educating yourself about funds.

About the Author:
http://www.seguin-associates.com Seguin & Associates Financial Services Ltd. is a financial planning service located in Windsor, Ontario. They are dedicated to the delivery of professional retirement planning, estate planning, tax planning and life insurance.

Copyright Seguin & Associates Financial Services - http://www.seguin-associates.com



Written By: Seguin & Associates Financial Services



Mutual Funds News

Your Funds by Chuck Jaffe : Getting a handle on what's ahead in the ... - Arizona Daily Star
The big stories in the mutual-fund world are always taking shape, but the new year gives us a chance to gaze into the crystal ball and try to read the future headlines. Here are the fund-world stories that could capture the headlines in the year ...

Audit: Library's stock holdings improper - Oxford Press
HAMILTON — HAMILTON — Financial gifts bequeathed in the wills of two local residents to the Lane Public Library were not invested properly, according to the state auditor's office. The state released its findings Thursday, Jan. 8, from a routine ...

Considering dumping a mutual fund? Think twice - Seattle Times
Fiscal fitness is knocking weight loss off the top of many New Year's resolution lists, thanks to 2008's market drubbing. That often means casting off last year's worst-performing mutual funds for more promising alternatives. Though a recovery may be ...

Investors putting more money into stock and bond funds - Marketwatch
SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Investors pumped more money into mutual funds in the first trading days of 2009, with U.S. and international stock funds seeing estimated inflows of $6.4 billion in the week through Wednesday, TrimTabs Investment ...

Whatever You Do, Avoid Mutual Funds - MSNBC
I'm here to steer you away from dastardly mutual funds and toward more sensible investments. Such as ... well, I'll think of some soon. In the meantime, let me list the countless drawbacks of mutual funds. If you invest in a mutual fund, you'll ...